Image: Thanks To Dom Swentosky/Troutbitten
When you lose a fish, Dom Swentosky thinks, you’re at fault– not the fish.
And losing a fish is distinctly various from missing out on one, as Dom takes care to mention. In this current story over at Troutbitten, Dom sets out why he “thinks the blame lies with the angler and not the fish” when your line unexpectedly goes slack in the middle of a battle.
As is frequently the case in fly fishing, Dom presumes, the factor we lose fish is impatience. Whether we’re attempting to horse the fish in too rapidly or we beat the gun on the hook set, not offering things adequate time is a dish for failure.
However it’s not entirely impatience, either. Dom likewise keeps in mind that where you combat a fish effects whether you’ll lose it.
” Trout are best combated in the lower 2 thirds of the water column,” he composes. “The riverbed is a bad location to eliminate a trout, therefore is the surface area. And I see that these 2 locations are where most losses happen.”
Reflecting on my own fishing, my experiences carefully mirror Dom’s. How frequently have you lost a fish when you had its direct above water, and you were inches far from slipping it into your internet, just for the fish to make a last– and effective– rush for flexibility? After checking out Dom’s story and believing on those experiences, I recognize that the majority of the fish I lost because circumstance most likely had not been defended enough time.
I motivate you to read his story and reflect by yourself failures, and how you can gain from them. You can check out the whole story here.
